WDC registry not a democracy
I found it interesting that the WDC announced the establishment of an "Amateur Commission" within the DanceSport Executive Board with the "equivalent voting rights of the Coaches and Competitors Commissions." The WDC claims that this provides amateur competitors who join its new amateur registry a "direct line of communication to the policy making committee." Obviously they are feeling pressure to move away from their closed system of governance.
Don't fool yourself if you think this is anything like the democracy competitors enjoy through existing amateur registries associated with the IDSF. It's not. All it means is that the amateur registry now has a single seat on the board dominated by the concerns of professionals.
While I applaud the WDCs desire to create a free and open competitive environment -- something we desperately need -- I hope that amateurs aren't sucked into believing that this means they'll have the kind of open voice and individual member voting privileges they currently enjoy under the IDSF-affiliated amateur registries around the world.
Don't fool yourself if you think this is anything like the democracy competitors enjoy through existing amateur registries associated with the IDSF. It's not. All it means is that the amateur registry now has a single seat on the board dominated by the concerns of professionals.
While I applaud the WDCs desire to create a free and open competitive environment -- something we desperately need -- I hope that amateurs aren't sucked into believing that this means they'll have the kind of open voice and individual member voting privileges they currently enjoy under the IDSF-affiliated amateur registries around the world.
